A New Chapter for Triumph's 400cc Platform
Triumph has finally introduced the iconic Thruxton aesthetic to its 400cc lineup, a move long awaited by fans of small-displacement motorcycles. The Thruxton 400 immediately stands out as one of the most visually striking bikes of the year. While aesthetics are a matter of personal taste, the classic cafe racer silhouette is difficult to ignore, especially when the bike is seen in natural light, ready for a day of spirited riding.
Comparing the Riding Experience
Recently, I had the opportunity to put both the Thruxton 400 and the Tracker 400 through their paces on the same set of roads. This back-to-back testing allowed for a clear comparison of how these two machines behave in real-world conditions. Although one might assume the primary differences are limited to ergonomics or the presence of a fairing, the reality reveals a more nuanced experience.
Thruxton vs. Tracker: Personality and Comfort
The Thruxton 400 is a masterclass in cafe racer design and is surprisingly accessible for shorter riders. However, the Tracker 400 provided an unexpected level of satisfaction. While the Thruxton demands a more aggressive, tucked-in riding position, the Tracker offers a more relaxed, upright posture thanks to its wider handlebars.
As I noted during the test, it is arguably no surprise that the more upright bike feels more inviting for everyday use:
«The Tracker 400 is a bike you'd marry, while the Thruxton is a machine you admire for its stunning looks.»
Which One Should You Choose?
Choosing between these two comes down to your personal riding priorities. Neither machine is a poor choice. If you prefer the classic, sporty aesthetic of a cafe racer, the Thruxton is a phenomenal option. If you prioritize comfort and a more casual seating position, the Tracker is likely the better companion. Regardless of your preference, both bikes represent a significant step forward for Triumph's entry-level segment.